
What I find most interesting is that the 'anti' group attacks the 'pro' group's evidence and science with such ferocity that the 'pro' group literally went back to the table and re-examined their evidence and science to see if maybe they made a mistake. Their conclusion? The evidence has increased, the science is sound, the issue is serious. The 'anti' group? So steadfast in their denial that they don't even care to re-examine their position.
This makes my choice of who to trust quite simple.
2 comments:
so what is your position Karl?
I tend to side with the pro climate change folks. The crap we're doing to this planet can't have no effect.
Post a Comment