I love listening in on the climate change debate. It's the perfect example of faith versus facts. The pro climate change folks argue that the issue is serious, we are causing it and it needs to be dealt with now before it's too late. The anti climate change folks think it's part of a natural cycle that has happened before, humans have little effect on it and there's nothing to worry about.
What I find most interesting is that the 'anti' group attacks the 'pro' group's evidence and science with such ferocity that the 'pro' group literally went back to the table and re-examined their evidence and science to see if maybe they made a mistake. Their conclusion? The evidence has increased, the science is sound, the issue is serious. The 'anti' group? So steadfast in their denial that they don't even care to re-examine their position.
This makes my choice of who to trust quite simple.
2 comments:
so what is your position Karl?
I tend to side with the pro climate change folks. The crap we're doing to this planet can't have no effect.
Post a Comment