Here's an interesting tact. Make a government (Washington State) see the folly of banning same sex marriage under the pretence that marriage exists for the sole purpose of procreation by introducing an initiative that would make procreation a requirement for legal marriage. In other words, if marriage exists for the sole purpose of making babies, then people shouldn't be allowed to marry or stay married if they're not making babies. It's almost funny, but it is a serious issue.
No monthly fees, no equipment to install
Sunday, February 11, 2007
No kids... no marriage
Here's an interesting tact. Make a government (Washington State) see the folly of banning same sex marriage under the pretence that marriage exists for the sole purpose of procreation by introducing an initiative that would make procreation a requirement for legal marriage. In other words, if marriage exists for the sole purpose of making babies, then people shouldn't be allowed to marry or stay married if they're not making babies. It's almost funny, but it is a serious issue.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I read Yahoo Answers when I want to waste time and I saw that article last week on a question. Sheesh. I don't even wanna get into it.
Since I live in WA state, I guess my husband and I will soon have to dissolve our marriage sense we don't intend on or are physically able to procreate if this initiative passes. Really, it's to confirm how ridiculous the ruling judge was on why they banned gay marriage based on the gay marriage amendment that was voted down last fall. Because the sole reason of marriage was to have children, yeah sure.
Post a Comment