- Cutting trees down for temporary decoration is very wasteful
- Real trees don't stay fresh very long
- The needles get everywhere
- For what many people pay for a real tree, you could have a better looking fake one in two years
- They are a huge fire hazard
- Possibility of running into a Sasquatch while looking for trees in the woods
- That awful pine smell stays in the house for weeks ; D
- Did I mention they typically look pitiful?
Monday, December 18, 2006
Real Christmas tree? Why?
It boggles my mind why people still get real Christmas trees. Tradition aside, let's look at the down side of getting a real tree:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
There was a study done some time ago by I think UBC (forgive me if this is wrong, I heard it on the CBC last year) about real versus fake and it turns out in the long run the fake Christmas trees are actually worse for the environment. I get a real tree and then mulch it... oh and if you want a real tree that does not suck? IKEA baby 20 bucks.
Pet
I get a fake tree because I don't want to be picking pine needles out of the carpet until next July.
...or you could go down to fish & game, pay $5, and go cut your own tree (up to eight feet). In fact, for that one lisence fee you get to cut three trees! Give one to a friend/neighbour/home. We make a family day out of it, walk in the woods, find an out of the way place for lunch. It's become a tradition in our family.
Jon: Stodgy!!?? [putting up dukes] Cum'ere ya l'il whippersnapper!
We always have a real Christmas tree. Always will, end of story.
We always have a real Christmas tree. Always will, end of story.
Post a Comment