data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f522/3f5220a6431d92da18f36adb64669e068b676793" alt=""
The Calgary Transportation Plan officially indicated the new Airport Trail which connects the Deerfoot to the airport would tunnel (b) under the new runway so it could connect with points east. What nobody seemed to bother checking was the cost of such a tunnel and who would be on the hook to pay for it. The airport folks figure it's not up to them to pay for Calgary roads, new runway notwithstanding. That has left everyone else looking at each other saying "I'm not paying for it." But there's a big drive from interested parties lobbying that the tunnel must be built or the sky is going to fall.
Having had a chance to look at the big picture, I don't even know why we're bothering to consider a tunnel at all. Although extending Airport Trail to the east side of the airport may seem very convenient, the existing Country Hills Boulevard (d) could easily connect points east to the airport with a little road expansion - which it desperately needs anyway. Of course, nothing is going to make it easy getting to the airport from the east side of Calgary unless the roads on the east side of the city are improved as well. There were also concerns that any future LRT line connecting to the airport would need a tunnel under the runway as well, but it seems that there is no agreement on where the LRT line to the airport would be coming from anyway. Some have indicated the smarter choice would be to build an LRT line coming from the west, from the Deerfoot, assuming a high speed rail station will be built in that area in the future. I'm not holding my breath on that plan either. My two cents - the LRT line to the airport should be getting built...... NOW! In which case a tunnel may be justified.
So - Karl's compromise - if you care, is to abandon the tunnel idea and get cracking on improvements to Country Hills Blvd and other roads to the east as a means of access. If you look at the map, it won't make much of a difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment