data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c832d/c832d3bc0fffc53eb113a06d93a2d2ac62a9a7ef" alt=""
It's a minor annoyance, but it sure would be nice to get it fixed. But I'm not paying for it - even though the warranty has expired. Why? Because it's a defect. How do I know? I base this conclusion on the fact that Palm's own online documents mention the defect (of course - they don't call it a defect). Their inclusion of the problem in their site is evidence that it's a well known problem. OK, ignore that. Do a web search on the issue and you'll get plenty of returns from people just like me with the same problem. And they're not happy. Because they feel the same way I do. They don't feel they should pay to get a defect fixed either.
Palm doesn't share our position. They would rather we call for support (which costs) which will likely result in having to send the thing in to get fixed (which costs some more). I say no. I'm not paying. It's a defect. Defects should result in a recall. Recalls don't cost the customer money. Customers who don't have to pay to resolve known defects are happy customers. Happy customers become repeat customers. They also tend to attract more potential customers.
Are you listening - Palm? I love my Palm. Whether I buy another one is entirely up to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment